ESG is "an awkward acronym" that is "not compelling", according to Sarasin & Partners' Natasha Landell-Mills, who said the semantics behind differing terms for sustainable investing "need to be improved".
"People are pulling their hair out about the fact there is no one taxonomy for responsible investing. No, there is not, but I do not think that is necessarily a problem," the head of stewardship said. "We need to improve the semantics and get better definitions, for sure. But the fact there is diversity is in a sense good because it means there is quite a lot of creativity, and quite a lot of doing things in an original way." Asset managers failing to lead the way on responsible investment However, she describes ESG - or environmental, social and governance investing - as "three ra...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes