Trade body's recommendations to explain charges more fully are unlikely to be adopted across the board.
Some asset managers are unlikely to adopt the IMA’s recommendations about providing extra details on fund charges, as they fear bombarding investors with too much information. The trade body published a consultation paper last week urging fund houses to enhance transparency on fund charges across all investor-facing documents, as well as giving a more prominent position to the ‘ongoing charge’ instead of the AMC. Mark Sherwin, senior adviser at the IMA, argued the AMC does not give the full picture of charges as it does not include audit, depositary or legal fees for example. Mean...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes