Peter Askew, co-manager of the T. Bailey Growth fund, says investors are at risk of missing out on the best Asian opportunities by only allocating to the region through emerging market labels
According to the US Department of Agriculture, three Asian countries - China, India and Japan - will occupy second, third and fourth position in the GDP (gross domestic product) rankings by 2030, with China and India the fastest growers from 2015 levels (see chart below). While China and India represent two letters of the 'BRICs' emerging market acronym, Japan is treated as a developed market. For many years, investors have made separate allocations to Japan as well as the US, so does it make sense to consider separate allocations to China and India as well? Or does their 'emerging' t...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes