Big Question Part I: Have investors become too optimistic about the impact of a Trump presidency?

Fund managers share their views

clock • 23 min read

In the first of a special three-part Big Question, fund managers give their views on whether President Trump can deliver on his campaign promises, and what this will mean for markets.

Nick Peters, multi-asset portfolio manager at Fidelity International

More like 'Dubya' than Reagan

Markets are too optimistic about a Trump presidency and have essentially priced in a 'best Trump' scenario. Pricing in tax cuts and extra fiscal spending is all well and good, but the S&P Industrials sector has risen by 8% in advance of any material details.

At the same time, there is little indication about what the impact of this stimulus will be in an economy which is at, or close, to full capacity. Comparisons to Ronald Reagan are popular, but I think George W. Bush is more relevant - fiscal deficits and large tax cuts did little to boost US growth in the mid-2000s.

Of course, there is also a broader question about the extent to which the markets have been factoring in the Trump effect versus better economic growth generally. PMI data has been unequivocally strong over the past few months and our own economic leading indicator has risen to post-2013 highs. 

Regardless, there are still plenty of reasons for a pause for breath.

Didier Saint-Georges, managing director at Carmignac

The return of the 'plain capitalist'  

Trump, a businessman who made it to President of the US, represents a sudden return of plain capitalism, with all its flaws and potentials. It means less regulations, less taxes, more investments and more focus on competitiveness. 

No wonder a wave of optimism is sweeping the US right now, as illustrated by the massive rise in consumer confidence and small business optimism since election. Equity markets duly reflect this major turning point. 

However, investors may be missing an important point: the MSCI World's impressive 87% rally in the past five years was mostly a re-rating, which has taken the market valuation to a 17.5X earnings multiple extreme. This re-rating was driven by the action of central banks, which brought interest rates to the floor.

Now inflation is awakening, so bond yields are finally bottoming out, and central banks will not be able to do much about it. So the Trump presidency could turn out to be much better for the US economy than for equity investors. 

Paul Hodges, chairman of International eChem and editor of The pH Report

Morning in America? No chance

Wall Street has the wrong idea about Trump. It has decided he is a new Ronald Reagan and will deliver a major bull market with his policies. Unfortunately, investors have forgotten their history.

Both men certainly share a link with the entertainment industry. But Reagan was a West Coast governor before he became President, and took office towards the end of one of the worst recessions in the 20th Century.

By contrast, Trump is an East Coast property tycoon and takes office at the end of an eight-year bull market. Critically, the demographic background to their presidency could not be more different. 

For Reagan, it was "Morning in America", with the vast baby boomer cohort coming into their peak wealth creation years. 

Trump, by contrast, inherits a more divided society. The ageing white boomers are approaching retirement, whilst over 90% of population growth since 2000 has been to the poorer, non-white minority communities. Generating Reagan-like growth is impossible, given this context.

More on US

BlackRock launches US mega-cap ETF in Europe
US

BlackRock launches US mega-cap ETF in Europe

Top 20 companies in S&P 500

Beth Brearley
clock 14 November 2024 • 1 min read
What is next for the US after Donald Trump's re-election?
US

What is next for the US after Donald Trump's re-election?

Round-up of Trump's policies

Sorin-Andrei Dojan
clock 13 November 2024 • 1 min read
US inflation rises to 2.6% in October as core measure remains firm
US

US inflation rises to 2.6% in October as core measure remains firm

Matching economist expectations

Valeria Martinez
clock 13 November 2024 • 1 min read
Trustpilot