The dangers of investment management fee reductions

Could impact of RDR and FCA study backfire?

clock • 3 min read

One of the advantages that investment trusts have historically enjoyed over their open-ended peers is lower fees, writes Simon Elliott, head of investment trust research at Winterflood Securities.

Before the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) abolished the practice in 2012, most open-ended funds paid trail commission to intermediaries. This heavier fee load was arguably part of the reason investment trusts have tended to outperform open-ended funds over the long term. However, since RDR there has been a significant repricing of investment management fees for actively managed funds. This segment of the industry has come under growing pressure from passive funds, with beta proving increasingly inexpensive. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA's) Asset Management Market Study has...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

Trustpilot