Many analysts use sovereign ratings as a proxy for country risk, despite the fact they are two distinct risk types, say Marcel Heinrichs and Ivelina Stanoeva at S&P Capital IQ.
The sovereign debt crisis and other fast-paced economic trends trouble credit analysts trying to evaluate the effects on corporate creditworthiness. This process can be extraordinarily problematic - especially considering few financial institutions take a rigorous approach to quantifying country risk. Many analysts simply fall back on existing sovereign ratings - used as a "ceiling" or "cap" on the creditworthiness of domestic businesses - when the two risk types are conceptually distinct. Indeed, sovereign ratings are intended to capture the risk of a sovereign default, while country ri...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes