Investors buying passives risk missing out on active funds that deliver real total returns well above what trackers can deliver, Jonathan Willcocks, M&G's global head of retail sales, argues.
The active versus passive debate is guaranteed to inflame passions, and the pros and cons of both sides of the argument have been widely documented. Now we are in an RDR world, the debate has broadened and the focus should be on value for money. What are clients paying for, and what are they getting? Let me put this into the context of everyday life. If you go to a retailer to buy a suit or a washing machine, you are not consciously looking for the average suit or washing machine. You are looking for the best product which fits your specific requirements. So why would you choose to ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes