Gary Rusby, head of business development at GHC Capital Markets, asks if investors can truly trust a benchmark when assessing a fund or fund manager's performance
In theory, benchmarks sound, and are, great. By comparing a fund or portfolio performance against a standardised basket assessed to perform in line with a suitable risk profile, advisers ought to be able to select funds or managers to match client requirements within their risk boundaries. They also allow advisers to hold their managers to account. All in all, benchmarks ought to be a powerful tool for investors. But too often, we are not comparing like with like. In practice, benchmarking can not only be misleading, but potentially dangerous, for the client. Unlikely comparisons I...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes