Baillie Gifford's Charles Plowden, joint senior partner and manager of the £1bn Monks investment trust, has criticised the "oversimplification" and "flawed analysis" used in coverage of the active versus passive management debate.
In a high-profile intervention, Plowden (pictured) said in a letter to the Financial Times that he welcomes the debate because it "shines a light on best practice in active management" but he is concerned by the "over-simplification of the topic and its consequences". He said: "The basic argument of some academic studies, industry commentators and many journalists is that there is little chance of picking an active manager that will beat passively invested funds, after fees, over the long term. When an active manager is successful, most simply attribute this to luck. "So the argument ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes