The closest we get to a really big argument in the world of investment is when passive is pitted against active management.
Not quite high level religious sectarianism, but we have managed to make a debate out of it, as only our industry can do. I am sure it originates from some kind of snobbery or hierarchy in financial services. We crack jokes about actuaries being boring, but probably most of us are not smart enough to know what actuaries do. Equity managers think they are more interesting than bond managers, but that was before we had CDOs and ABS and all those lovely acronyms. The active versus passive debate has always seemed as pointless as working out if one part of the industry is cleverer than an...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes