In its renaming of the Managed sectors, the IMA said it talked to all the interested parties. The trouble is, it missed out the most important - investors.
Only in our industry would an exercise to simplify something result in an even more opaque system. Quite how replacing three words with four letters is simpler is beyond me. Most people would agree the current system is not satisfactory, but the description ‘managed’ in itself is meaningless. Most investors would believe – rightly – ‘managing’ is what they pay fund managers to do, so calling anything managed is stating the obvious. The three Managed sector descriptions do not give any understanding of the real risk, and many advisers are not clear how much exposure to equities each ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes