What the recent FSA Guidance Note on investor risk profiling made clear was that it is useless to spend time assessing a customer's attitude to investment risk unless at least equal attention is given to ensuring the investment recommended matches the customer's risk tolerance.
However, that is easier said than done, because it depends on which of the many investment risks the customer is most worried about. Sadly, the FSA offered little by way of practical suggestions on how to achieve the difficult task of matching an investment to a customer’s requirements and views about investment risk. Faced with this problem, general industry practice has been to assign investment funds to risk buckets based on a measurement of a fund’s short-term volatility. In practice, it is a little like trying to decide on the best means of transport when all you are told about i...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes