One of the drawbacks from investing in assets like silver, wine, art or gold (SWAG) is that mainstream analysts typically default to rejecting the asset class because it lacks an income stream.
Finance 101 has taught such analysts that an asset needs an income stream in order for it to have an implied value. Yet, as Dylan Grice of Soc Gen so eloquently put it: “Suppose we think of a typical SWAG asset. It has finite supply and stable to rising demand, but it offers no cashflow. When we discount its future cashflows, they sum to zero. So using a discounted cashflow model, such an asset has zero value. Therefore, a Picasso has a zero value. But a Picasso clearly does have a value. So the model is clearly limited.” It is seemingly easy to dismiss many tangible assets like wine pre...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes