A relatively genteel war of words - a war-ette, if you like - is bubbling about who should provide at-retirement guidance for the poor, hapless schmooks who reach their third age under George Osborne's new pension regime, writes Mark Polson.
On the one hand, you've got bodies such as the publicly-funded TPAS, who argue that they have a track record of a) knowing their stuff, b) delivering unbiased information and c) doing a lot with a little. On the other you've got providers - not all, but a few - who argue that they a) have more information on the client, b) have got servicing scale and capacity to deliver and c) promise not to do any selling. So how do we make concord of this discord? I think it's pretty easy, and it has to do with the old woman and the snake. In case you're unfamiliar, the old woman finds a half-dead ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes