The ‘glide path' idea informs not only the intellectual core of most financial planning, but also shapes a large part of investment practice.
What is it? In simple terms, the old adage among wealth advisers has been that an investor should have an equity weighting of 110% minus current age, giving a 55-year old, for example, a 55% exposure to stocks, but a 25-year-old an 85% percent weighting. Yet this conventional wisdom has been under fierce attack in recent years, not least by equity fundamentalist Rob Arnott and his colleagues at Research Affiliates. In a paper called What are we doing to our young investors?, co-authored with Lillian Wu, Arnott takes aim at the beginning of the glide path – young people who are supposed t...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes