Contrarian: QE - A lot harder to get out than in

clock

Every once in a while I am forced, reluctantly, away from my ivory contrarian tower, and dumped on to the mean streets of middle Britain to talk to actual, real, living investors and their advisers.

The venue is usually a roadshow of some variety, and my mission is to be contrarian. At the moment, my favourite party trick consists of a challenge for investors to think about how asset allocation works in a world dominated by quantitative easing. I ask the assembled audience the following question: "Would anybody like to guess how long we could be living with low interest rates and QE?" I follow with: "Guess what their average duration is for the length of QE in its various iterations in the future?" When I say '23 years' I used to expect gasps of horror and shock, but now there is...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Markets

Trustpilot