Passive providers could do everything their active peers do with a little creativity and more joined up thinking, writes David Stevenson.
Back in mid-September, S&P released yet another iteration of its annual SPIVA scorecard comparing active and passive funds. The message was that 84.6% of US-based large-cap managers, 87.9% of mid-cap managers, and 88.8% of small-cap managers underperformed their appropriate benchmark. This increasingly predictable result was preceded in August by another front opening up in the long running active/passive war, one we can loosely describe as "living up to your responsibilities as an asset manager" debate. After all, if there is no active manager sitting at the heart of the stock sel...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes