In light of the FCA's Asset Management Market Study, Rowan Dartington's Guy Stephens revisits the eternal debate about the roles active and passive investments can play in ensuring end-investors receive value for money.
The passive versus active question has reignited once more following the recent FCA review into charges within the asset management industry and it is of course important to ensure end-investors are receiving value for money. There is also a valid point in that, at the advising end of the recommendation process, we all naturally tend to charge less as a percentage fee, the more wealthy the individual client, as there becomes a focus on the absolute figure the client is paying. At the fund management end of the process, no such value transfer takes place with fund managers benefiting enti...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes