Gary Teper, head of investment management at Charles Stanley, argues it would be foolish for wealth managers to ignore the rise of robo-advice propositions.
I recently attended a wealth management conference where a member of the audience asked a panel of industry grandees whether they were concerned about the rise of robo-advisers and if it would pose a threat to traditional models in the future. I was surprised when the panel quite nonchalantly dismissed robo-advice as a fringe proposition that was unlikely to materially impact their businesses. This could prove to be a strategic error. M&A, rebrands and Lloyds push: The biggest wealth management stories in recent months Firstly, it is worth defining what we mean by robo-adviser. Sim...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes