An ESG policy defined by excluding companies is "the weakest form of ESG", according to Mike Kelly, global head of multi-asset at PineBridge Investments, who said the investment principle was "never supposed to be all about how you select securities", but rather "how you engage with those securities once you are an owner".
"If you are a university student in your 20s without any financial assets, making speeches [about environmental concerns] out on the campus, then good for you. Keep doing what you can," Kelly said. "But when you look at the asset management industry, it would be a shame if that is all we did." Kelly added that while credit is owed to "excluders" who "did kind of start the movement", the "real power" lies in getting asset owners and managers focused on engaging with companies for the "purpose of improvement". Fund managers overestimate social and environmental impact Passive inve...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes