The 60 structured products that have lost investors money in the past ten years overwhelmingly used an American-style capital protection barrier and were linked to alternative indices such as the European or emerging stockmarkets or commodities baskets, according to structuredproductreview.com data.
The website delved into the reasons investors saw negative returns on some structured products between 2010 and 2019, finding that some had been launched pre-financial crisis, meaning the losses stemmed from that event. Three others were as a result of a mid-term re-structuring by the provider to protect against potential counterparty default. However, the main linked reasons were due to the products using an American capital protection barrier, rather than a European one. The Top Down: AHFM CIO Tom May on structured products post-Crisis An American barrier means if the linked inde...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes