The board of the £66.3m Gresham House Strategic trust (GHS) has hit back against its incumbent asset manager's - and largest shareholder - accusations, saying its recent claims contain “material inaccuracies” and its proposals do not “take account of the best interests of all shareholders”.
Yesterday (19 October), the board of Gresham House called for shareholders of GHS to be offered liquidity to release their full investment at net asset value, claiming the results of the strategic review of the trust was "inadequate". This is in relation to the fact only Gresham House has been offered liquidity to realise their full investment at NAV. Now GHS has responded saying that the conclusion of the review was "mischaracterised", since it was not to provide liquidity, but to appoint Harwood Capital as the new investment manager. In response to the call for GHS to offer all...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
Signup and gain exclusive members-only insights - all free of charge!
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes
