Wealth managers across Europe admit their systems for assessing client portfolios are “not suitable for the task” and rely too much on “subjective human judgement”.
According to the study from Oxford Risk, almost two-thirds (65%) of the wealth managers agreed that "current systems are too reliant on subjective human judgement". Just 5% disputed this and said there was not too much subjectivity, while the remaining 30% were ‘neutral' on the issue. Morningstar: ESG portfolio implementation still lags among major global investors Oxford Risk analysts said 64% of advisers had criticised existing suitability processes and systems for "being too cumbersome" and not responding to rapid changes in clients' circumstances fast enough. The study was c...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes