While the invasion of Ukraine has echoes of the previous incursions in support of breakaway regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, on this occasion the scope and audacity is far beyond what we have seen previously.
An increasingly isolated and belligerent President Vladimir Putin (according to outward shows) has engaged in a far deeper incursion that certainly looks as if regime change could be its end-goal, or certainly the point of leverage for an exit strategy. Surprising to many observers, this has elicited a far more determined response from the international community. There certainly was a logic, from a Russian perspective, in seeking to protect a buffer zone between it and the Eastern frontiers of the NATO-alliance. However, assumptions about the venality and decadence in the West, an...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes