The meaning of “ESG”, “Sustainability” and “Impact”, and the roles they (should) play in steering the world towards a greener, more socially conscientious future, are becoming increasingly politicised.
What has stood out to me is the polarised debate of Engagement versus Divestment, as if the two approaches to holding public companies to account are (or should be) binary. Divestment (or at least the threat thereof) is an integral part of an effective "engagement toolkit", to be used when all other forms of leverage have failed. French regulator to ban fossil fuels from Article 9 funds in landmark move So, what is an effective "engagement toolkit"? First, let us start with the problem. If a public company persistently refuses to engage, provide the requested transparency and...
To continue reading this article...
Join Investment Week for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
- Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
- Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
- Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
- Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes