Meritsoft's James Cookson: The debate around the optionality rules for research payments

'A significant shift in the landscape'

clock • 3 min read

Earlier this year, the Financial Conduct Authority’s launched a policy statement called PS24/9, introducing new rules on payment optionality for investment research that promise to offer greater flexibility and operational simplicity, particularly for smaller firms.

Following feedback from industry, the FCA has proposed to extend those freedoms to pooled investment funds, alternative investment funds and UCITS funds too, allowing fund managers to combine payments for research with trade execution. Both updates mark a significant shift in the landscape of research payments for investment firms, but will this actually boost efficiency and economic growth?   The most notable change going forward is the allowance for joint payments for third-party research, enabling firms to combine payments for research and execution. FCA urged to adopt reforms a...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on Regulation

Trustpilot